US-China Tensions Rise as Beijing Summons US Ambassador

Tensions between China and the United States escalated Saturday as China’s Foreign Ministry summoned U.S. Ambassador to China Terry Branstad to issue a harsh protest against U.S. sanctions set for the purchase of Russian fighter jets and surface-to-air missiles.

The move came hours after China canceled trade talks with the U.S. following Washington’s imposition of new tariffs on Chinese goods.

The statement on the Chinese Foreign Ministry’s website called the imposition of sanctions “a serious violation of the basic principles of international law” and a “hegemonic act.” The ministry also wrote, “Sino-Russian military cooperation is the normal cooperation of the two sovereign states, and the U.S. has no right to interfere.” The U.S. actions, it said, “have seriously damaged the relations” with China. 

China had earlier called on the U.S. to withdraw the sanctions, and speaking to reporters Friday, Foreign Ministry spokesman Geng Shuang said Beijing had lodged an official protest with the United States.

China’s purchase of the weapons from Russian arms exporter Rosoboronexport violated a 2017 U.S. law intended to punish the government of Russian President Vladimir Putin for interfering in U.S. elections and other activities. The U.S. action set in motion a visa ban on China’s Equipment Development Department and director Li Shangfu, forbids transactions with the U.S. financial system, and blocks all property and interests in property involving the country within U.S. jurisdiction.

Meanwhile, The Wall Street Journal reported that China had planned to send Vice Premier Liu He to Washington next week for trade talks, but canceled his trip, along with that of a midlevel delegation that was to precede him.

Earlier Friday, a senior White House official had said the U.S. was optimistic about finding a way forward in trade talks with China.

The official told reporters at the White House that China “must come to the table in a meaningful way” for there to be progress on the trade dispute. 

The official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said that while there was no confirmed meeting between the United States and China, the two countries “remain in touch.”

“The president’s team is all on the same page as to what’s required from China,” according to the official.

The Trump administration has argued that tariffs on Chinese goods would force China to trade on more favorable terms with the United States. 

It has demanded that China better protect American intellectual property, including ending the practice of cybertheft. The Trump administration has also called on China to allow U.S. companies greater access to Chinese markets and to cut its U.S. trade surplus.

Earlier this week, the United States ordered duties on another $200 billion of Chinese goods to go into effect on Sept. 24. China responded by adding $60 billion of U.S. products to its import tariff list.

The United States already has imposed tariffs on $50 billion worth of Chinese goods, and China has retaliated on an equal amount of U.S. goods.

Kavanaugh Accuser Agrees to Testify

A woman who has accused U.S. Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault has agreed to testify before a Senate panel next week, her lawyers said Saturday.

U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley had set a Saturday afternoon deadline for Christine Blasey Ford, a California professor who accused Kavanaugh of sexually assaulting her at a high school party 36 years ago, to decide whether and how she would testify.

“Dr. Ford accepts the committee’s request to provide her firsthand knowledge of Brett Kavanaugh’s sexual misconduct next week,” Debra Katz and Lisa Banks, Ford’s attorneys, said in a statement. “We are hopeful that we can reach agreement on details.”

A person briefed on the discussions said late Saturday that a tentative agreement had been reached for the Judiciary Committee to hear testimony Thursday from Ford and Kavanaugh. Other terms of the public hearing are to be negotiated Sunday, the source said.

The Republican-controlled committee had delayed a vote on Kavanaugh’s confirmation after Ford’s allegation emerged last week. Kavanaugh has denied the allegation.

Confirming Kavanaugh’s nomination would cement conservative control of the Supreme Court and advance a White House effort to tilt the American judiciary farther to the right.

Grassley had said earlier that the panel would vote on Kavanaugh’s confirmation on Monday unless a deal was reached with Ford’s lawyers by a Friday night deadline. Katz had said the deadline was “aggressive and artificial.”

“Your cavalier treatment of a sexual assault survivor who has been doing her best to cooperate with the committee is completely inappropriate,” Katz added.

On Friday, President Donald Trump sought to cast doubt on Ford’s allegation that Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her in 1982 when both were high school students in Maryland.

The Judiciary Committee has struggled with how to proceed with Kavanaugh’s nomination. Democrats have demanded more time for scrutiny, and Republicans want to move ahead quickly with a confirmation vote in an increasingly volatile political climate ahead of congressional elections on Nov. 6.

‘A fine man’

Trump and the White House had been careful not to malign Ford after her allegations surfaced, but Trump dropped the restraint in his tweets on Friday.

“I have no doubt that, if the attack on Dr. Ford was as bad as she says, charges would have been immediately filed with local Law Enforcement Authorities by either her or her loving parents,” Trump wrote. “I ask that she bring those filings forward so that we can learn date, time, and place!

“Judge Brett Kavanaugh is a fine man, with an impeccable reputation, who is under assault by radical left wing politicians who don’t want to know the answers, they just want to destroy and delay.”

Earlier, Trump had said Ford should be heard, even if it meant a delay in the confirmation process.

Republicans will be forced to walk a careful line in questioning Ford’s account without alienating female voters ahead of the elections. Before the 2016 presidential election, more than a dozen women accused Trump of making unwanted advances.

The Judiciary Committee released a letter it sent to Ford’s attorneys on Friday in which it accepted some of their demands, including that Kavanaugh not be in the room when she testifies.

The panel rejected some of the other demands, including that Kavanaugh testify first, that the committee call additional witnesses that Ford requests, and that only senators be allowed to ask questions.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, speaking at a gathering of evangelical voters in Washington, assured them Kavanaugh would be confirmed.

The Senate panel must approve Kavanaugh’s confirmation before a vote by the full Senate, where Republicans hold a 51-49 majority. Kavanaugh’s confirmation to the lifetime position would be the second of the Trump administration and solidify conservative control of the nation’s top court. 

Ford has received death threats, while Kavanaugh and his wife also have received threats.

Some information for this report came from AP.

Kavanaugh Accuser Agrees to Testify

A woman who has accused U.S. Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault has agreed to testify before a Senate panel next week, her lawyers said Saturday.

U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley had set a Saturday afternoon deadline for Christine Blasey Ford, a California professor who accused Kavanaugh of sexually assaulting her at a high school party 36 years ago, to decide whether and how she would testify.

“Dr. Ford accepts the committee’s request to provide her firsthand knowledge of Brett Kavanaugh’s sexual misconduct next week,” Debra Katz and Lisa Banks, Ford’s attorneys, said in a statement. “We are hopeful that we can reach agreement on details.”

A person briefed on the discussions said late Saturday that a tentative agreement had been reached for the Judiciary Committee to hear testimony Thursday from Ford and Kavanaugh. Other terms of the public hearing are to be negotiated Sunday, the source said.

The Republican-controlled committee had delayed a vote on Kavanaugh’s confirmation after Ford’s allegation emerged last week. Kavanaugh has denied the allegation.

Confirming Kavanaugh’s nomination would cement conservative control of the Supreme Court and advance a White House effort to tilt the American judiciary farther to the right.

Grassley had said earlier that the panel would vote on Kavanaugh’s confirmation on Monday unless a deal was reached with Ford’s lawyers by a Friday night deadline. Katz had said the deadline was “aggressive and artificial.”

“Your cavalier treatment of a sexual assault survivor who has been doing her best to cooperate with the committee is completely inappropriate,” Katz added.

On Friday, President Donald Trump sought to cast doubt on Ford’s allegation that Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her in 1982 when both were high school students in Maryland.

The Judiciary Committee has struggled with how to proceed with Kavanaugh’s nomination. Democrats have demanded more time for scrutiny, and Republicans want to move ahead quickly with a confirmation vote in an increasingly volatile political climate ahead of congressional elections on Nov. 6.

‘A fine man’

Trump and the White House had been careful not to malign Ford after her allegations surfaced, but Trump dropped the restraint in his tweets on Friday.

“I have no doubt that, if the attack on Dr. Ford was as bad as she says, charges would have been immediately filed with local Law Enforcement Authorities by either her or her loving parents,” Trump wrote. “I ask that she bring those filings forward so that we can learn date, time, and place!

“Judge Brett Kavanaugh is a fine man, with an impeccable reputation, who is under assault by radical left wing politicians who don’t want to know the answers, they just want to destroy and delay.”

Earlier, Trump had said Ford should be heard, even if it meant a delay in the confirmation process.

Republicans will be forced to walk a careful line in questioning Ford’s account without alienating female voters ahead of the elections. Before the 2016 presidential election, more than a dozen women accused Trump of making unwanted advances.

The Judiciary Committee released a letter it sent to Ford’s attorneys on Friday in which it accepted some of their demands, including that Kavanaugh not be in the room when she testifies.

The panel rejected some of the other demands, including that Kavanaugh testify first, that the committee call additional witnesses that Ford requests, and that only senators be allowed to ask questions.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, speaking at a gathering of evangelical voters in Washington, assured them Kavanaugh would be confirmed.

The Senate panel must approve Kavanaugh’s confirmation before a vote by the full Senate, where Republicans hold a 51-49 majority. Kavanaugh’s confirmation to the lifetime position would be the second of the Trump administration and solidify conservative control of the nation’s top court. 

Ford has received death threats, while Kavanaugh and his wife also have received threats.

Some information for this report came from AP.

Від загострення відносин між Києвом та Будапештом виграє Москва – Климпуш-Цинцадзе

Віце-прем’єр з питань європейської та євроатлантичної інтеграції Іванна Климпуш-Цинцадзе застерігає Угорщину від продовження «геополітичних ігор». Про це чиновниця написала на своїй сторінці у Facebook у відповідь на заяву міністра закордонних справ Угорщини Петера Сійярто, що Угорщина може і далі сповільнювати інтеграцію України до євроструктур.

«Економічний, соціальний розвиток Закарпаття – області, яка межує з чотирма країнами-членами ЄС, – безпосередньо залежить від успішності європейської інтеграції України. Це єдина українська область, де понад 90% експорту припадає на ЄС. Закарпатці будуть першими, хто найбільше постраждає від зупинки євроінтеграційного поступу України», – зазначила вона.

На думку Климпуш-Цинцадзе, подальше загострення ситуації «дорого коштуватиме українцям угорського походження».

«Мова ультиматумів – це хибний шлях, якого ми всіляко прагнемо уникнути. Від загострення відносин між Угорщиною та Україною виграє лише Росія. На жаль, у Будапешті відмовляються чути наші заклики до конструктивного діалогу щодо всіх чутливих питань. Хочу підкреслити, суверенітет України – не може бути предметом компромісу чи якихось підкилимних домовленостей. Український народ щодня змушений платити за нього занадто високу ціну», – заявила віце-прем’єр.

Цього тижня засоби інформації оприлюднили відео, на якому українцям роздають паспорти Угорщини у консульстві Угорщини в Береговому з проханням не повідомляти про це владі. Голова МЗС України Павло Клімкін зазначив, що відомство перевіряє автентичність відео і назвав можливим видворення угорського консула у Берегові.

Читайте також: Угорський паспорт як загроза. Реакція України

У відповідь міністр закордонних справ Угорщини Петер Сійярто попередив, що його країна витлумачила б можливу висилку угорського консула з Берегова як недружній і ризикований крок, який перемістив би стан двосторонніх відносин у «новий вимір» і не залишився би без відповіді Будапешта.

Політик додав, що Угорщина стежить за розвитком подій і не виключив можливості застосування заходів для уповільнення процесу євроінтеграції України.

Від загострення відносин між Києвом та Будапештом виграє Москва – Климпуш-Цинцадзе

Віце-прем’єр з питань європейської та євроатлантичної інтеграції Іванна Климпуш-Цинцадзе застерігає Угорщину від продовження «геополітичних ігор». Про це чиновниця написала на своїй сторінці у Facebook у відповідь на заяву міністра закордонних справ Угорщини Петера Сійярто, що Угорщина може і далі сповільнювати інтеграцію України до євроструктур.

«Економічний, соціальний розвиток Закарпаття – області, яка межує з чотирма країнами-членами ЄС, – безпосередньо залежить від успішності європейської інтеграції України. Це єдина українська область, де понад 90% експорту припадає на ЄС. Закарпатці будуть першими, хто найбільше постраждає від зупинки євроінтеграційного поступу України», – зазначила вона.

На думку Климпуш-Цинцадзе, подальше загострення ситуації «дорого коштуватиме українцям угорського походження».

«Мова ультиматумів – це хибний шлях, якого ми всіляко прагнемо уникнути. Від загострення відносин між Угорщиною та Україною виграє лише Росія. На жаль, у Будапешті відмовляються чути наші заклики до конструктивного діалогу щодо всіх чутливих питань. Хочу підкреслити, суверенітет України – не може бути предметом компромісу чи якихось підкилимних домовленостей. Український народ щодня змушений платити за нього занадто високу ціну», – заявила віце-прем’єр.

Цього тижня засоби інформації оприлюднили відео, на якому українцям роздають паспорти Угорщини у консульстві Угорщини в Береговому з проханням не повідомляти про це владі. Голова МЗС України Павло Клімкін зазначив, що відомство перевіряє автентичність відео і назвав можливим видворення угорського консула у Берегові.

Читайте також: Угорський паспорт як загроза. Реакція України

У відповідь міністр закордонних справ Угорщини Петер Сійярто попередив, що його країна витлумачила б можливу висилку угорського консула з Берегова як недружній і ризикований крок, який перемістив би стан двосторонніх відносин у «новий вимір» і не залишився би без відповіді Будапешта.

Політик додав, що Угорщина стежить за розвитком подій і не виключив можливості застосування заходів для уповільнення процесу євроінтеграції України.

Порошенко Німеччині: не потрапте в Путінову газову пастку

Президент України Петро Порошенко застеріг Німеччину від газової залежності від Росії.

В інтерв’ю німецькій газеті «Райніше пост» він знову нагадав, що підтримуваний владою Німеччини газогінний проект російського газового монополіста «Газпрому» «Північний потік-2», що має пролягти дном Балтійського моря в обхід України, «не має ніякого економічного сенсу», а є натомість намаганням Росії послабити Україну, позбавивши її транзитних зборів.

Крім того, додав Порошенко, президент Росії Володимир Путін хоче влаштувати геополітичний тиск на Європу.

«Можу попередити наших європейських друзів із власного гіркого досвіду: якщо бути настільки залежним від постачання газу з Росії, як була Україна кілька років тому, можна стати об’єктом шантажу. Можу сказати вам, що то був зовсім не приємний момент, коли Путін зателефонував мені, щоб сказати, що «Газпром» наступного дня перекриє кран. Не потрапте в ту саму пастку!» – сказав Порошенко кореспондентові газети.

Він нагадав, що газотранспортна система України має потужність транспортувати 146 мільярдів кубометрів російського газу до Західної Європи, а нині використовує тільки трохи більш як 90 мільярдів із цієї потужності. «Тож навіщо витрачати 20 мільярдів доларів на зайвий трубопровід? Дайте самі відповідь на це питання», – додав президент.

Україна і деякі європейські країни називають проект «Північний потік-2» суто політичним, без економічного обґрунтування, і закликають заблокувати його. З різкою критикою проекту виступають і США. Тим часом низка країн-членів Європейського союзу, в першу чергу Німеччина, компанії з яких беруть участь у будівництві газопроводу, підтримують «Північний потік-2» і говорять про нього як про «суто економічний проект». При цьому канцлер Німеччини Анґела Меркель заявляла, що робота газопроводу можлива лише в разі, якщо Росія не припинить транзит газу через Україну.

Порошенко Німеччині: не потрапте в Путінову газову пастку

Президент України Петро Порошенко застеріг Німеччину від газової залежності від Росії.

В інтерв’ю німецькій газеті «Райніше пост» він знову нагадав, що підтримуваний владою Німеччини газогінний проект російського газового монополіста «Газпрому» «Північний потік-2», що має пролягти дном Балтійського моря в обхід України, «не має ніякого економічного сенсу», а є натомість намаганням Росії послабити Україну, позбавивши її транзитних зборів.

Крім того, додав Порошенко, президент Росії Володимир Путін хоче влаштувати геополітичний тиск на Європу.

«Можу попередити наших європейських друзів із власного гіркого досвіду: якщо бути настільки залежним від постачання газу з Росії, як була Україна кілька років тому, можна стати об’єктом шантажу. Можу сказати вам, що то був зовсім не приємний момент, коли Путін зателефонував мені, щоб сказати, що «Газпром» наступного дня перекриє кран. Не потрапте в ту саму пастку!» – сказав Порошенко кореспондентові газети.

Він нагадав, що газотранспортна система України має потужність транспортувати 146 мільярдів кубометрів російського газу до Західної Європи, а нині використовує тільки трохи більш як 90 мільярдів із цієї потужності. «Тож навіщо витрачати 20 мільярдів доларів на зайвий трубопровід? Дайте самі відповідь на це питання», – додав президент.

Україна і деякі європейські країни називають проект «Північний потік-2» суто політичним, без економічного обґрунтування, і закликають заблокувати його. З різкою критикою проекту виступають і США. Тим часом низка країн-членів Європейського союзу, в першу чергу Німеччина, компанії з яких беруть участь у будівництві газопроводу, підтримують «Північний потік-2» і говорять про нього як про «суто економічний проект». При цьому канцлер Німеччини Анґела Меркель заявляла, що робота газопроводу можлива лише в разі, якщо Росія не припинить транзит газу через Україну.

Предстоятелі Александрійської та Польської церков звернулися із закликом вирішити «церковні непорозуміння» в Україні

17 вересня президент України під час зустрічі з екзархами Вселенського патріархату заявив, що Україна вийшла на фінішну пряму в питанні отримання томосу

Предстоятелі Александрійської та Польської церков звернулися із закликом вирішити «церковні непорозуміння» в Україні

17 вересня президент України під час зустрічі з екзархами Вселенського патріархату заявив, що Україна вийшла на фінішну пряму в питанні отримання томосу

На Генасамблеї ООН обговорять ситуацію на тимчасово окупованих територіях України – Порошенко

До порядку денного 73-ї сесії Генеральної асамблеї Організації Об’єднаних Націй включили пункт про ситуацію на тимчасово окупованих територіях України. Про це у Facebook повідомив президент України Петро Порошенко.

«На виконання мого доручення успішно проведена робота про включення до порядку денного 73-ї сесії ГА ООН нового пункту «Ситуація на тимчасово окупованих територіях України». Це дозволить крізь шквал дезінформації донести до світової спільноти істину щодо трагічних наслідків окупації РФ Криму та триваючої агресії на Донбасі. Дякую усім, хто підтримав», – написав він.

20 вересня під час щорічного звернення до народних депутатів Верховної Ради президент пообіцяв, що у своєму виступі на Генасамблеї ООН підніме, зокрема, питання розміщення миротворчого контингенту на Донбасі. 

Раніше постійний представник України в Організації Об’єднаних Націй Володимир Єльченко повідомляв, що президент Порошенко виступить під час сесії Генеральної асамблеї ООН 26 вересня 2018 року, а візит загалом триватиме з 24 по 27 вересня.

Єльченко очікує, що, окрім миротворців, президент згадає про Голодомор, а також на Генасамблеї обговорюватимуть новий проект резолюції ООН, присвячений анексованому Росією Криму, що врахує, серед іншого, питання політичних в’язнів.

Читайте також: «Порошенко доручив підготувати нову резолюцію щодо Криму для розгляду в ООН»

Першу резолюцію на захист територіальної цілісності України Генеральна асамблея ухвалила ще в березні 2014 року, майже одразу після початку окупації півострова.

З того часу Генасамблея кілька разів підтверджувала свою підтримку територіальної неподільності України – наприклад, ухваленням резолюції щодо прав людини в Криму в грудні 2016 року.

Однак резолюції Генасамблеї не є обов’язковими до виконання, вони декларують ставлення членів ООН до важливих світових проблем. У Раді безпеки, рішення якої обов’язкові до виконання, Росія має право вето і блокує будь-яку критику своїх дій.

Збройний конфлікт на Донбасі триває від 2014 року після російської анексії Криму. Україна і Захід звинувачують Росію у збройній підтримці бойовиків. Кремль відкидає ці звинувачення і заявляє, що на Донбасі можуть перебувати хіба що російські «добровольці». За даними ООН, за час конфлікту загинули понад 10 тисяч людей.

Читайте також: Трамп говоритиме про справу Скрипалів на Генасамблеї – посол США в ООН

На Генасамблеї ООН обговорять ситуацію на тимчасово окупованих територіях України – Порошенко

До порядку денного 73-ї сесії Генеральної асамблеї Організації Об’єднаних Націй включили пункт про ситуацію на тимчасово окупованих територіях України. Про це у Facebook повідомив президент України Петро Порошенко.

«На виконання мого доручення успішно проведена робота про включення до порядку денного 73-ї сесії ГА ООН нового пункту «Ситуація на тимчасово окупованих територіях України». Це дозволить крізь шквал дезінформації донести до світової спільноти істину щодо трагічних наслідків окупації РФ Криму та триваючої агресії на Донбасі. Дякую усім, хто підтримав», – написав він.

20 вересня під час щорічного звернення до народних депутатів Верховної Ради президент пообіцяв, що у своєму виступі на Генасамблеї ООН підніме, зокрема, питання розміщення миротворчого контингенту на Донбасі. 

Раніше постійний представник України в Організації Об’єднаних Націй Володимир Єльченко повідомляв, що президент Порошенко виступить під час сесії Генеральної асамблеї ООН 26 вересня 2018 року, а візит загалом триватиме з 24 по 27 вересня.

Єльченко очікує, що, окрім миротворців, президент згадає про Голодомор, а також на Генасамблеї обговорюватимуть новий проект резолюції ООН, присвячений анексованому Росією Криму, що врахує, серед іншого, питання політичних в’язнів.

Читайте також: «Порошенко доручив підготувати нову резолюцію щодо Криму для розгляду в ООН»

Першу резолюцію на захист територіальної цілісності України Генеральна асамблея ухвалила ще в березні 2014 року, майже одразу після початку окупації півострова.

З того часу Генасамблея кілька разів підтверджувала свою підтримку територіальної неподільності України – наприклад, ухваленням резолюції щодо прав людини в Криму в грудні 2016 року.

Однак резолюції Генасамблеї не є обов’язковими до виконання, вони декларують ставлення членів ООН до важливих світових проблем. У Раді безпеки, рішення якої обов’язкові до виконання, Росія має право вето і блокує будь-яку критику своїх дій.

Збройний конфлікт на Донбасі триває від 2014 року після російської анексії Криму. Україна і Захід звинувачують Росію у збройній підтримці бойовиків. Кремль відкидає ці звинувачення і заявляє, що на Донбасі можуть перебувати хіба що російські «добровольці». За даними ООН, за час конфлікту загинули понад 10 тисяч людей.

Читайте також: Трамп говоритиме про справу Скрипалів на Генасамблеї – посол США в ООН

Gray Muck in NC River Near Flooded Coal Ash Dump

Gray muck is flowing into the Cape Fear River from the site of a dam breach at a Wilmington power plant Friday where an old coal ash dump had been covered over by Florence’s floodwaters.

Duke Energy spokeswoman Paige Sheehan said Friday the utility doesn’t believe the breach at the L.V. Sutton Power Station poses a significant threat of increased flooding to nearby communities.

The potential environmental threat was unclear.

No environmental regulators were at the scene, with officials citing unsafe conditions.

Floodwaters breached several points early Friday in the earthen dam at Sutton Lake, the plant’s 1,100-acre (445-hectare) reservoir. Lake water then flooded one of three large coal ash dumps lining the lakeshore.

Sheehan said the company can’t rule out that ash might be escaping the flooded dump and flowing through the lake into the river.

​Toxic heavy metals

The ash left over when coal is burned to generate electricity contains mercury, lead, arsenic and other toxic heavy metals. Duke said Friday the inundated basin at the plant contains about 400,000 cubic yards (305,820 cubic meters) of ash.

The area received more than 30 inches (75 centimeters) of rain from former Hurricane Florence, with the Cape Fear River still rising Friday and expected to crest Sunday and remain at flood stage through early next week.

Gray material the company characterized as “coal combustion byproducts” could be seen floating in the lake and river.​

​Biggest coal ash spill of Florence

Earthjustice, an environmental advocacy group with a boat in the river, provided The Associated Press with images Friday showing wide gray slicks in the water. A team member plucked a turtle from the muck and rinsed it off.

“Any big spill like this raises concerns about the impacts on the estuary ecosystem in the lower Cape Fear River,” said Pete Harrison, a staff attorney with Earthjustice on the boat. “This is Duke’s third coal ash spill in the aftermath of Hurricane Florence, and it looks like it’s the biggest yet.”

North Carolina’s top environmental regulator said the possible environmental harm isn’t yet known. No state inspectors had arrived by late Friday, though officials said they would be there as soon as conditions are considered safe for personnel to navigate the river and be onsite.

“What we don’t know at this point is if any coal ash has filtered into the Cape Fear River,” said Mike Regan, secretary for the state Department of Environmental Quality, at a news conference in Raleigh. “We plan to conduct flyovers.”

Environmental Protection Agency regional administrator Trey Glenn said his staff was monitoring the situation at Sutton from the state Emergency Operations Center in Raleigh, about 150 miles (240 kilometers) northwest of the Sutton plant. He said dozens of EPA staff were scattered throughout the region impacted by Florence, checking on toxic waste sites and oil storage facilities.

“EPA serves in a support role to the impacted states and has offered assistance to North Carolina to help them respond to the reported Sutton coal ash incident,” Glenn said. “As of this evening, North Carolina has not requested additional support.”

​No regulators on site

With no regulators at the Sutton plant, it was left to Duke employees to collect water samples that would be tested in the company’s in-house lab. Environmental groups also collected samples from the river that would be sent to a private lab.

Security personnel for Duke blocked access Friday to Sutton Lake Road, leading to a public dock on the reservoir, a popular boating and fishing site.

Duke denied a request for an Associated Press reporter to cross the barricade, saying the lake situation “continues to change” and is “not safe.”

Sutton Lake is the former cooling pond for a coal-fired plant Duke retired in 2013 and replaced with a new generating station running off natural gas. Duke said that power plant was shut down overnight and all employees safely evacuated.

Third breach, earlier scrutiny

The breach at the Wilmington site is separate from last weekend’s reported rupture at a nearby coal ash landfill, which spilled enough material to fill 180 dump trucks.

Duke’s ash waste management has faced intense scrutiny since a drainage pipe collapsed under a waste pit at an old plant in Eden in 2014, triggering a massive spill that coated miles (kilometers) of the Dan River in gray sludge. The utility later agreed to plead guilty to nine Clean Water Act violations and pay $102 million in fines and restitution for illegally discharging pollution from ash dumps at five North Carolina power plants. It plans to close all its ash dumps by 2029.

At the separate Duke plant near Goldsboro, three old coal-ash dumps capped with soil and trees were underwater Thursday after the Neuse River flooded.

Staff from the environmental group Waterkeeper Alliance visited the flooded dumps at the H.F. Lee Power Plant by boat Wednesday, took photographs and collected samples of gray sludge washing into the floodwaters.

State environmental regulators visited the site Thursday, but said they were unable to make a full assessment because of high water levels. The Duke spokeswoman Sheehan said any coal ash release at the Goldsboro site appeared “minimal.”

South Carolina plant

Meanwhile, South Carolina’s state-owned utility said it expected floodwaters to enter a coal ash pond at one of its closed power plants. Santee Cooper spokeswoman Mollie Gore said the overtopping of an ash basin at the Granger plant near Conway should not be environmentally significant.

Gore said nearly all the ash has been removed from the basin and water pumped in to prevent the dike from breaking. The company had placed a 2-foot (72-centimeter) high inflatable berm around the top of a second pond that has more coal ash in it. She estimates 200,000 tons (181 million kilograms) of ash are in a corner of the pond furthest from the rising Waccamaw River.

Gray Muck in NC River Near Flooded Coal Ash Dump

Gray muck is flowing into the Cape Fear River from the site of a dam breach at a Wilmington power plant Friday where an old coal ash dump had been covered over by Florence’s floodwaters.

Duke Energy spokeswoman Paige Sheehan said Friday the utility doesn’t believe the breach at the L.V. Sutton Power Station poses a significant threat of increased flooding to nearby communities.

The potential environmental threat was unclear.

No environmental regulators were at the scene, with officials citing unsafe conditions.

Floodwaters breached several points early Friday in the earthen dam at Sutton Lake, the plant’s 1,100-acre (445-hectare) reservoir. Lake water then flooded one of three large coal ash dumps lining the lakeshore.

Sheehan said the company can’t rule out that ash might be escaping the flooded dump and flowing through the lake into the river.

​Toxic heavy metals

The ash left over when coal is burned to generate electricity contains mercury, lead, arsenic and other toxic heavy metals. Duke said Friday the inundated basin at the plant contains about 400,000 cubic yards (305,820 cubic meters) of ash.

The area received more than 30 inches (75 centimeters) of rain from former Hurricane Florence, with the Cape Fear River still rising Friday and expected to crest Sunday and remain at flood stage through early next week.

Gray material the company characterized as “coal combustion byproducts” could be seen floating in the lake and river.​

​Biggest coal ash spill of Florence

Earthjustice, an environmental advocacy group with a boat in the river, provided The Associated Press with images Friday showing wide gray slicks in the water. A team member plucked a turtle from the muck and rinsed it off.

“Any big spill like this raises concerns about the impacts on the estuary ecosystem in the lower Cape Fear River,” said Pete Harrison, a staff attorney with Earthjustice on the boat. “This is Duke’s third coal ash spill in the aftermath of Hurricane Florence, and it looks like it’s the biggest yet.”

North Carolina’s top environmental regulator said the possible environmental harm isn’t yet known. No state inspectors had arrived by late Friday, though officials said they would be there as soon as conditions are considered safe for personnel to navigate the river and be onsite.

“What we don’t know at this point is if any coal ash has filtered into the Cape Fear River,” said Mike Regan, secretary for the state Department of Environmental Quality, at a news conference in Raleigh. “We plan to conduct flyovers.”

Environmental Protection Agency regional administrator Trey Glenn said his staff was monitoring the situation at Sutton from the state Emergency Operations Center in Raleigh, about 150 miles (240 kilometers) northwest of the Sutton plant. He said dozens of EPA staff were scattered throughout the region impacted by Florence, checking on toxic waste sites and oil storage facilities.

“EPA serves in a support role to the impacted states and has offered assistance to North Carolina to help them respond to the reported Sutton coal ash incident,” Glenn said. “As of this evening, North Carolina has not requested additional support.”

​No regulators on site

With no regulators at the Sutton plant, it was left to Duke employees to collect water samples that would be tested in the company’s in-house lab. Environmental groups also collected samples from the river that would be sent to a private lab.

Security personnel for Duke blocked access Friday to Sutton Lake Road, leading to a public dock on the reservoir, a popular boating and fishing site.

Duke denied a request for an Associated Press reporter to cross the barricade, saying the lake situation “continues to change” and is “not safe.”

Sutton Lake is the former cooling pond for a coal-fired plant Duke retired in 2013 and replaced with a new generating station running off natural gas. Duke said that power plant was shut down overnight and all employees safely evacuated.

Third breach, earlier scrutiny

The breach at the Wilmington site is separate from last weekend’s reported rupture at a nearby coal ash landfill, which spilled enough material to fill 180 dump trucks.

Duke’s ash waste management has faced intense scrutiny since a drainage pipe collapsed under a waste pit at an old plant in Eden in 2014, triggering a massive spill that coated miles (kilometers) of the Dan River in gray sludge. The utility later agreed to plead guilty to nine Clean Water Act violations and pay $102 million in fines and restitution for illegally discharging pollution from ash dumps at five North Carolina power plants. It plans to close all its ash dumps by 2029.

At the separate Duke plant near Goldsboro, three old coal-ash dumps capped with soil and trees were underwater Thursday after the Neuse River flooded.

Staff from the environmental group Waterkeeper Alliance visited the flooded dumps at the H.F. Lee Power Plant by boat Wednesday, took photographs and collected samples of gray sludge washing into the floodwaters.

State environmental regulators visited the site Thursday, but said they were unable to make a full assessment because of high water levels. The Duke spokeswoman Sheehan said any coal ash release at the Goldsboro site appeared “minimal.”

South Carolina plant

Meanwhile, South Carolina’s state-owned utility said it expected floodwaters to enter a coal ash pond at one of its closed power plants. Santee Cooper spokeswoman Mollie Gore said the overtopping of an ash basin at the Granger plant near Conway should not be environmentally significant.

Gore said nearly all the ash has been removed from the basin and water pumped in to prevent the dike from breaking. The company had placed a 2-foot (72-centimeter) high inflatable berm around the top of a second pond that has more coal ash in it. She estimates 200,000 tons (181 million kilograms) of ash are in a corner of the pond furthest from the rising Waccamaw River.

Senator Gives Kavanaugh Accuser More Time to Decide About Testimony 

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Charles Grassley has given the woman who has accused Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault more time to decide if she will testify next week.

The Senate committee had given Christine Blasey Ford until 10 p.m. Friday to make a decision, but her lawyer asked for a one-day extension just minutes before the Friday deadline.

Grassley announced the extension on Twitter in a post with an apologetic tone that was addressed to Kavanaugh.

Lawyers for Ford have said she wants to testify before a Senate panel next week, but only if her safety is ensured. According to U.S. media reports, attorney Debra Katz said in an email to the Senate Judiciary Committee that Ford wishes to testify “provided that we can agree on terms that are fair and which ensure her safety.”

Katz said her client has gotten death threats, and Ford and her family have been forced from their California home.

Grassley, a Republican, has scheduled a hearing for Monday for both Ford and Kavanaugh to appear to tell their stories.

But Katz wrote that “Monday’s date is not possible and the committee’s insistence that it occur then is arbitrary in any event.”

Katz said Ford’s “strong preference” is that “a full investigation” be completed before she testifies. She had earlier called for the FBI to look into the charges against Kavanaugh.

Trump tweets

On Friday, U.S. President Donald Trump questioned the integrity of Ford, posting on Twitter that “if the attack … was as bad as she says, charges would have been immediately filed” with police.

Trump also accused “radical left wing politicians” of attacking Kavanaugh, who Ford said sexually assaulted her at a house party 36 years ago.

Late Thursday, the White House released a letter from Kavanaugh to Grassley in which he said he wants to tell his side in a Monday hearing.

“I will be there. I continue to want a hearing as soon as possible so that I can clear my name,” he wrote.

Media reports say Kavanaugh has also received what law enforcement officials say are credible death threats.

Confirmation seemed certain

Trump chose Kavanaugh to fill the vacancy on the Supreme Court created by the retirement of Justice Anthony Kennedy.

His approval by the Judiciary Committee and the Republican-majority Senate appeared to be an almost certainty until The Washington Post published its interview with Ford, who is now a California psychology professor.

She alleged a “stumbling drunk” 17-year-old Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her at a Maryland house party in 1982 when both were in high school. She said Kavanaugh pinned her to a bed and groped her, putting his hand over her mouth when she tried to scream, before she managed to escape.

Kavanaugh has adamantly denied the charges, saying he has never done any such thing to Ford or any other woman.

​Supporters for both sides

Women who say they have known and worked with Kavanaugh throughout his legal career say he has been respectful and fair in dealing with them. Dozens of women who support Kavanaugh held a Washington news conference Friday.

Sara Fagen, who described herself as a friend and former colleague of Kavanaugh, said she and the other women at the news conference believe the allegation is untrue.

“The reason that we know that this allegation is false is because we know Brett Kavanaugh,” Fagen said.

Women who attended Holton-Arms High School in Bethesda, Maryland, with Ford signed a letter in support of her that was personally delivered Thursday to Republican Senator and Holton-Arms alumna Shelley Moore Capito. Organizers said it was signed by more than 1,000 former students.

“We believe Dr. Blasey Ford and are grateful that she came forward to tell her story,” the letter said. “Dr. Blasey Ford’s experience is all too consistent with stories we heard and lived while attending Holton. Many of us are survivors ourselves.”

Republican lawmakers are trying to win Senate confirmation for Kavanaugh ahead of the court’s start of a new term on Oct. 1, or if not by then, ahead of the Nov. 6 nationwide congressional elections, to show Republican voters they have made good on campaign promises to place conservative judges like Kavanaugh on the Supreme Court.

Senator Gives Kavanaugh Accuser More Time to Decide About Testimony 

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Charles Grassley has given the woman who has accused Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault more time to decide if she will testify next week.

The Senate committee had given Christine Blasey Ford until 10 p.m. Friday to make a decision, but her lawyer asked for a one-day extension just minutes before the Friday deadline.

Grassley announced the extension on Twitter in a post with an apologetic tone that was addressed to Kavanaugh.

Lawyers for Ford have said she wants to testify before a Senate panel next week, but only if her safety is ensured. According to U.S. media reports, attorney Debra Katz said in an email to the Senate Judiciary Committee that Ford wishes to testify “provided that we can agree on terms that are fair and which ensure her safety.”

Katz said her client has gotten death threats, and Ford and her family have been forced from their California home.

Grassley, a Republican, has scheduled a hearing for Monday for both Ford and Kavanaugh to appear to tell their stories.

But Katz wrote that “Monday’s date is not possible and the committee’s insistence that it occur then is arbitrary in any event.”

Katz said Ford’s “strong preference” is that “a full investigation” be completed before she testifies. She had earlier called for the FBI to look into the charges against Kavanaugh.

Trump tweets

On Friday, U.S. President Donald Trump questioned the integrity of Ford, posting on Twitter that “if the attack … was as bad as she says, charges would have been immediately filed” with police.

Trump also accused “radical left wing politicians” of attacking Kavanaugh, who Ford said sexually assaulted her at a house party 36 years ago.

Late Thursday, the White House released a letter from Kavanaugh to Grassley in which he said he wants to tell his side in a Monday hearing.

“I will be there. I continue to want a hearing as soon as possible so that I can clear my name,” he wrote.

Media reports say Kavanaugh has also received what law enforcement officials say are credible death threats.

Confirmation seemed certain

Trump chose Kavanaugh to fill the vacancy on the Supreme Court created by the retirement of Justice Anthony Kennedy.

His approval by the Judiciary Committee and the Republican-majority Senate appeared to be an almost certainty until The Washington Post published its interview with Ford, who is now a California psychology professor.

She alleged a “stumbling drunk” 17-year-old Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her at a Maryland house party in 1982 when both were in high school. She said Kavanaugh pinned her to a bed and groped her, putting his hand over her mouth when she tried to scream, before she managed to escape.

Kavanaugh has adamantly denied the charges, saying he has never done any such thing to Ford or any other woman.

​Supporters for both sides

Women who say they have known and worked with Kavanaugh throughout his legal career say he has been respectful and fair in dealing with them. Dozens of women who support Kavanaugh held a Washington news conference Friday.

Sara Fagen, who described herself as a friend and former colleague of Kavanaugh, said she and the other women at the news conference believe the allegation is untrue.

“The reason that we know that this allegation is false is because we know Brett Kavanaugh,” Fagen said.

Women who attended Holton-Arms High School in Bethesda, Maryland, with Ford signed a letter in support of her that was personally delivered Thursday to Republican Senator and Holton-Arms alumna Shelley Moore Capito. Organizers said it was signed by more than 1,000 former students.

“We believe Dr. Blasey Ford and are grateful that she came forward to tell her story,” the letter said. “Dr. Blasey Ford’s experience is all too consistent with stories we heard and lived while attending Holton. Many of us are survivors ourselves.”

Republican lawmakers are trying to win Senate confirmation for Kavanaugh ahead of the court’s start of a new term on Oct. 1, or if not by then, ahead of the Nov. 6 nationwide congressional elections, to show Republican voters they have made good on campaign promises to place conservative judges like Kavanaugh on the Supreme Court.

DHS Secretary: FEMA Chief Won’t Lose Job

The head of the federal disaster response agency used government vehicles without proper authorization, but will not lose his job over it, Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen said Friday.

Federal Emergency Management Agency Administrator William “Brock” Long had been under investigation by the Homeland Security Department’s watchdog over possibly misusing government vehicles to travel to his home in Hickory, North Carolina. Word leaked of the investigation just as Hurricane Florence was poised to make landfall earlier this month.

Nielsen said in a statement Friday that there had been a longstanding practice to transport FEMA administrators in government vehicles to ensure they could remain connected during a crisis. But despite this practice, use of government vehicles for home-to-work travel was not officially authorized, and that practice was eliminated in April.

Nielsen said the report by Homeland Security’s Office of Inspector General also found Long used government vehicles for nonofficial reasons.

Reimburse the government

She said they spoke about the problems and Long agreed to reimburse the government, though it wasn’t clear how much money that might be. She said she directed the department to review policy on home-to-work transportation problems, assess communication requirements at FEMA so officials can be best connected during disasters, and to review of and training regarding proper use of government vehicles.

“We had a productive conversation where we discussed my expectations regarding the agency’s use of government vehicles going forward,” Nielsen said in a statement. “The administrator acknowledged that mistakes were made, and he took personal responsibility.”

The inspector general’s report has not been made public. The House Oversight Committee is also looking into the allegations and has asked Long to turn over to the committee all documents related to the trips by Oct. 1, including whether his staff was put up in hotels paid for by taxpayer dollars.

The inspector general’s office has turned the review over to federal prosecutors to determine whether any criminal charges are warranted, according to a person familiar with the probe. It’s not uncommon for an inspector general to refer cases so federal prosecutors can determine whether charges are warranted, and it doesn’t mean he’ll be charged with a crime. The person was not authorized to speak publicly on the matter and requested anonymity.

In the days after Florence struck, Long said he was not focused on the investigation and instead was working to help the region get back on its feet after the devastation. More than 40 have died and rising floodwaters cut off roads and drowned livestock.

Corrective action

In a statement Friday, Long said he accepted full responsibility.

“The secretary and I are taking corrective action to prevent such mistakes from happening in the future,” he said. “I remain committed to the critical mission of FEMA — helping people before, during and after disasters.”

He has been head of the Federal Emergency Management Agency since June 2017, presiding over a particularly grueling hurricane season that included Irma, Harvey and Maria, plus wildfires in California. The response to Maria has been heavily criticized, and Long has said FEMA learned lessons on how to better prepare for this year’s storms.

Other Trump administration officials have lost their jobs over ethics issues related to travel, but they involved more outsized allegations. The former head of the Environmental Protection Agency, Scott Pruitt, resigned in July after allegations of massive security spending, first-class flights and a sweetheart condo lease.

DHS Secretary: FEMA Chief Won’t Lose Job

The head of the federal disaster response agency used government vehicles without proper authorization, but will not lose his job over it, Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen said Friday.

Federal Emergency Management Agency Administrator William “Brock” Long had been under investigation by the Homeland Security Department’s watchdog over possibly misusing government vehicles to travel to his home in Hickory, North Carolina. Word leaked of the investigation just as Hurricane Florence was poised to make landfall earlier this month.

Nielsen said in a statement Friday that there had been a longstanding practice to transport FEMA administrators in government vehicles to ensure they could remain connected during a crisis. But despite this practice, use of government vehicles for home-to-work travel was not officially authorized, and that practice was eliminated in April.

Nielsen said the report by Homeland Security’s Office of Inspector General also found Long used government vehicles for nonofficial reasons.

Reimburse the government

She said they spoke about the problems and Long agreed to reimburse the government, though it wasn’t clear how much money that might be. She said she directed the department to review policy on home-to-work transportation problems, assess communication requirements at FEMA so officials can be best connected during disasters, and to review of and training regarding proper use of government vehicles.

“We had a productive conversation where we discussed my expectations regarding the agency’s use of government vehicles going forward,” Nielsen said in a statement. “The administrator acknowledged that mistakes were made, and he took personal responsibility.”

The inspector general’s report has not been made public. The House Oversight Committee is also looking into the allegations and has asked Long to turn over to the committee all documents related to the trips by Oct. 1, including whether his staff was put up in hotels paid for by taxpayer dollars.

The inspector general’s office has turned the review over to federal prosecutors to determine whether any criminal charges are warranted, according to a person familiar with the probe. It’s not uncommon for an inspector general to refer cases so federal prosecutors can determine whether charges are warranted, and it doesn’t mean he’ll be charged with a crime. The person was not authorized to speak publicly on the matter and requested anonymity.

In the days after Florence struck, Long said he was not focused on the investigation and instead was working to help the region get back on its feet after the devastation. More than 40 have died and rising floodwaters cut off roads and drowned livestock.

Corrective action

In a statement Friday, Long said he accepted full responsibility.

“The secretary and I are taking corrective action to prevent such mistakes from happening in the future,” he said. “I remain committed to the critical mission of FEMA — helping people before, during and after disasters.”

He has been head of the Federal Emergency Management Agency since June 2017, presiding over a particularly grueling hurricane season that included Irma, Harvey and Maria, plus wildfires in California. The response to Maria has been heavily criticized, and Long has said FEMA learned lessons on how to better prepare for this year’s storms.

Other Trump administration officials have lost their jobs over ethics issues related to travel, but they involved more outsized allegations. The former head of the Environmental Protection Agency, Scott Pruitt, resigned in July after allegations of massive security spending, first-class flights and a sweetheart condo lease.

Rising Oil Prices Haven’t Hurt US Economy

America’s rediscovered prowess in oil production is shaking up old notions about the impact of higher crude prices on the U.S. economy.

It has long been conventional wisdom that rising oil prices hurt the economy by forcing consumers to spend more on gasoline and heating their homes, leaving less for other things.

Presumably that kind of run-up would slow the U.S. economy. Instead, the economy grew at its fastest rate in nearly four years during the April-through-June quarter.

President Donald Trump appears plainly worried about rising oil prices just a few weeks before mid-term elections that will decide which party controls the House and Senate.

“We protect the countries of the Middle East, they would not be safe for very long without us, and yet they continue to push for higher and higher oil prices!” Trump tweeted Thursday. “We will remember. The OPEC monopoly must get prices down now!”

Members of The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, who account for about one-third of global oil supplies, are scheduled to meet this weekend with non-members including Russia.

The gathering isn’t expected to yield any big decisions — those typically come at major OPEC meetings like the one set for December. Oil markets, however, were roiled Friday by a report that attendees were considering a significant increase in production to offset declining output from Iran, where exports have fallen ahead of Trump’s re-imposition of sanctions.

OPEC and Russia have capped production since January 2017 to bolster prices. Output fell even below those targets this year, and in June the same countries agreed to boost the oil supply, although they didn’t give numbers.

Rising oil prices

Oil prices are up roughly 40 percent in the past year. On Friday, benchmark U.S. crude was trading around $71 a barrel, and the international standard, Brent, was closing in on $80.

The national average price for gasoline stood at $2.85 per gallon, up 10 percent from a year ago, according to auto club AAA. That increase likely would be greater were it not for a slump in gasoline demand that is typical for this time of year, when summer vacations are over.

The United States still imports about 6 million barrels of oil a day on average, but that is down from more than 10 million a decade ago. In the same period, U.S. production has doubled to more than 10 million barrels a day, according to government figures.

“Because the U.S. now is producing so much more than it used to, [the rise in oil prices] is not as big an impact as it would have been 20 years ago or 10 years ago,” said Michael Maher, an energy researcher at Rice University and a former Exxon Mobil economist.

The weakening link between oil and the overall economy was seen — in reverse — three years ago. Then, plunging oil prices were expected to boost the economy by leaving more money in consumers’ pocket, yet GDP growth slowed at the same time that lower oil prices took hold during 2015.

Other economists caution against minimizing the disruption caused by energy prices.

“Higher oil prices are unambiguously bad for the U.S. economy,” said Philip Verleger, an economist who has studied energy markets. “They force consumers to divert their income from spending on other items to spending on fuels.”

Since energy amounts to only about 3 percent of consumer spending, a cutback in that other 97 percent “causes losses for those who sell autos, restaurants, airlines, resorts and all parts of the economy,” Verleger said.

Pack leader

The federal Energy Information Administration said this month that the U.S. likely reclaimed the title of world’s biggest oil producer earlier this year by surpassing the output of Saudi Arabia in February and Russia over the summer. If the agency’s estimates are correct, it would mark the first time since 1973 that the U.S. has led the oil-pumping pack.

And that has made the impact of oil prices on the economy a more complicated calculation.

When oil prices tumbled starting in mid-2014, U.S. energy producers cut back on drilling. They cut thousands of jobs and they spent less on rigs, steel pipes and railcars to ship crude to refineries. That softened the bounce that economists expected to see from cheaper oil.

Now, with oil prices rising, energy companies are boosting production, creating an economic stimulus that offsets some of the blow from higher prices on consumers. Oil- and gas-related investment accounted for about 40 percent of the growth in business investment in the April-June quarter this year.

Moody’s Analytics estimates that every penny increase at the pump reduces consumer spending by $1 billion over a year, and gasoline has jumped 24 cents in the past year, according to AAA. That is “a clear-cut negative,” but not deeply damaging, said Ryan Sweet, director of real-time economics at Moody’s.

“Usually with gasoline prices, speed kills — a gradual increase [like the current one], consumers can absorb that,” Sweet said. Consumers have other factors in their favor, he added, including a tight job market, wage growth, better household balance sheets, and the recent tax cut.

Sweet said the boon that higher prices represent to the growing energy sector, which can invest in more wells, equipment and hiring, means that the run-up in crude has probably been “a small but net positive” for the economy.

“That could change if we get up to $3.50, $4,” he said.

Rising Oil Prices Haven’t Hurt US Economy

America’s rediscovered prowess in oil production is shaking up old notions about the impact of higher crude prices on the U.S. economy.

It has long been conventional wisdom that rising oil prices hurt the economy by forcing consumers to spend more on gasoline and heating their homes, leaving less for other things.

Presumably that kind of run-up would slow the U.S. economy. Instead, the economy grew at its fastest rate in nearly four years during the April-through-June quarter.

President Donald Trump appears plainly worried about rising oil prices just a few weeks before mid-term elections that will decide which party controls the House and Senate.

“We protect the countries of the Middle East, they would not be safe for very long without us, and yet they continue to push for higher and higher oil prices!” Trump tweeted Thursday. “We will remember. The OPEC monopoly must get prices down now!”

Members of The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, who account for about one-third of global oil supplies, are scheduled to meet this weekend with non-members including Russia.

The gathering isn’t expected to yield any big decisions — those typically come at major OPEC meetings like the one set for December. Oil markets, however, were roiled Friday by a report that attendees were considering a significant increase in production to offset declining output from Iran, where exports have fallen ahead of Trump’s re-imposition of sanctions.

OPEC and Russia have capped production since January 2017 to bolster prices. Output fell even below those targets this year, and in June the same countries agreed to boost the oil supply, although they didn’t give numbers.

Rising oil prices

Oil prices are up roughly 40 percent in the past year. On Friday, benchmark U.S. crude was trading around $71 a barrel, and the international standard, Brent, was closing in on $80.

The national average price for gasoline stood at $2.85 per gallon, up 10 percent from a year ago, according to auto club AAA. That increase likely would be greater were it not for a slump in gasoline demand that is typical for this time of year, when summer vacations are over.

The United States still imports about 6 million barrels of oil a day on average, but that is down from more than 10 million a decade ago. In the same period, U.S. production has doubled to more than 10 million barrels a day, according to government figures.

“Because the U.S. now is producing so much more than it used to, [the rise in oil prices] is not as big an impact as it would have been 20 years ago or 10 years ago,” said Michael Maher, an energy researcher at Rice University and a former Exxon Mobil economist.

The weakening link between oil and the overall economy was seen — in reverse — three years ago. Then, plunging oil prices were expected to boost the economy by leaving more money in consumers’ pocket, yet GDP growth slowed at the same time that lower oil prices took hold during 2015.

Other economists caution against minimizing the disruption caused by energy prices.

“Higher oil prices are unambiguously bad for the U.S. economy,” said Philip Verleger, an economist who has studied energy markets. “They force consumers to divert their income from spending on other items to spending on fuels.”

Since energy amounts to only about 3 percent of consumer spending, a cutback in that other 97 percent “causes losses for those who sell autos, restaurants, airlines, resorts and all parts of the economy,” Verleger said.

Pack leader

The federal Energy Information Administration said this month that the U.S. likely reclaimed the title of world’s biggest oil producer earlier this year by surpassing the output of Saudi Arabia in February and Russia over the summer. If the agency’s estimates are correct, it would mark the first time since 1973 that the U.S. has led the oil-pumping pack.

And that has made the impact of oil prices on the economy a more complicated calculation.

When oil prices tumbled starting in mid-2014, U.S. energy producers cut back on drilling. They cut thousands of jobs and they spent less on rigs, steel pipes and railcars to ship crude to refineries. That softened the bounce that economists expected to see from cheaper oil.

Now, with oil prices rising, energy companies are boosting production, creating an economic stimulus that offsets some of the blow from higher prices on consumers. Oil- and gas-related investment accounted for about 40 percent of the growth in business investment in the April-June quarter this year.

Moody’s Analytics estimates that every penny increase at the pump reduces consumer spending by $1 billion over a year, and gasoline has jumped 24 cents in the past year, according to AAA. That is “a clear-cut negative,” but not deeply damaging, said Ryan Sweet, director of real-time economics at Moody’s.

“Usually with gasoline prices, speed kills — a gradual increase [like the current one], consumers can absorb that,” Sweet said. Consumers have other factors in their favor, he added, including a tight job market, wage growth, better household balance sheets, and the recent tax cut.

Sweet said the boon that higher prices represent to the growing energy sector, which can invest in more wells, equipment and hiring, means that the run-up in crude has probably been “a small but net positive” for the economy.

“That could change if we get up to $3.50, $4,” he said.

China Cancels Trade Talks with US After New Tariffs

China has canceled trade talks with the United States following Washington’s imposition of new tariffs on Chinese goods.

The Wall Street Journal reports that China had planned to send Vice Premier Liu He to Washington next week for the talks, but has now canceled his trip along with that of a midlevel delegation that was to precede him.

US was optimistic

Earlier Friday, a senior White House official said the U.S. was optimistic about finding a way forward in trade talks with China.

The official told reporters at the White House that China “must come to the table in a meaningful way” for there to be progress on the trade dispute.

The official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said while there was no confirmed meeting between the United States and China, the two countries “remain in touch.”

“The president’s team is all on the same page as to what’s required from China,” according to the official.

Trade imbalance

The Trump administration has argued that tariffs on Chinese goods would force China to trade on more favorable terms with the United States.

It has demanded that China better protect American intellectual property, including ending the practice of cybertheft. The Trump administration has also called on China to allow U.S. companies greater access to Chinese markets and to cut its U.S. trade surplus.

Earlier this week, the United States ordered duties on another $200 billion of Chinese goods to go into effect Sept. 24. China responded by adding $60 billion of U.S. products to its import tariff list.

The United States has imposed tariffs on $50 billion worth of Chinese goods, and China has retaliated on an equal amount of U.S. goods.

Tariffs on all China imports?

Earlier this month, President Trump threatened even more tariffs on Chinese goods — another $267 billion worth of duties that would cover virtually all the goods China imports to the United States.

“That changes the equation,” he told reporters.

China has threatened to retaliate against any potential new tariffs. However, China’s imports from the United States are $200 billion a year less than American imports from China, so it would run out of room to match U.S. sanctions.

China Cancels Trade Talks with US After New Tariffs

China has canceled trade talks with the United States following Washington’s imposition of new tariffs on Chinese goods.

The Wall Street Journal reports that China had planned to send Vice Premier Liu He to Washington next week for the talks, but has now canceled his trip along with that of a midlevel delegation that was to precede him.

US was optimistic

Earlier Friday, a senior White House official said the U.S. was optimistic about finding a way forward in trade talks with China.

The official told reporters at the White House that China “must come to the table in a meaningful way” for there to be progress on the trade dispute.

The official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said while there was no confirmed meeting between the United States and China, the two countries “remain in touch.”

“The president’s team is all on the same page as to what’s required from China,” according to the official.

Trade imbalance

The Trump administration has argued that tariffs on Chinese goods would force China to trade on more favorable terms with the United States.

It has demanded that China better protect American intellectual property, including ending the practice of cybertheft. The Trump administration has also called on China to allow U.S. companies greater access to Chinese markets and to cut its U.S. trade surplus.

Earlier this week, the United States ordered duties on another $200 billion of Chinese goods to go into effect Sept. 24. China responded by adding $60 billion of U.S. products to its import tariff list.

The United States has imposed tariffs on $50 billion worth of Chinese goods, and China has retaliated on an equal amount of U.S. goods.

Tariffs on all China imports?

Earlier this month, President Trump threatened even more tariffs on Chinese goods — another $267 billion worth of duties that would cover virtually all the goods China imports to the United States.

“That changes the equation,” he told reporters.

China has threatened to retaliate against any potential new tariffs. However, China’s imports from the United States are $200 billion a year less than American imports from China, so it would run out of room to match U.S. sanctions.

Ситник заперечує, що попереджав Омеляна про обшуки

Голова Національного антикорупційного бюро України Артем Ситник заперечує, що попереджав міністра інфраструктури Володимира Омеляна про обшуки.

«Звичайно, були (контакти – ред.). Я не попереджав його про обшуки. Контакти були і дуже багато, тому що міністр постійно звертався, передавав матеріали по «Укрзалізниці» й інших справах, які стосувалися Міністерства інфраструктури», – сказав Ситник в ефірі телеканалу «UA:Перший».

20 вересня Омелян заявив, що Ситник попереджав його про обшуки. Після цього Спеціалізована антикорупційна прокуратура зареєструвала кримінальне провадження через можливе розголошення директором НАБУ даних досудового розслідування.

Зранку 13 вересня Національне антикорупційне бюро України повідомило Омеляну про підозру в незаконному збагаченні й декларуванні недостовірної інформації.

Міністр заявив про тиск з боку НАБУ, але додав, що йти у відставку не планує.

Дивіться також: Холодницький і Ситник прокоментували конфлікт між САП та НАБУ – відео

14 вересня Солом’янський районний суд Києва віддав Омеляна на поруки міністра молоді і спорту Ігоря Жданова та народного депутата Федора Бендюженка. Спеціалізована антикорупційна прокуратура просила для Омеляна п’ять мільйонів гривень.

Ситник заперечує, що попереджав Омеляна про обшуки

Голова Національного антикорупційного бюро України Артем Ситник заперечує, що попереджав міністра інфраструктури Володимира Омеляна про обшуки.

«Звичайно, були (контакти – ред.). Я не попереджав його про обшуки. Контакти були і дуже багато, тому що міністр постійно звертався, передавав матеріали по «Укрзалізниці» й інших справах, які стосувалися Міністерства інфраструктури», – сказав Ситник в ефірі телеканалу «UA:Перший».

20 вересня Омелян заявив, що Ситник попереджав його про обшуки. Після цього Спеціалізована антикорупційна прокуратура зареєструвала кримінальне провадження через можливе розголошення директором НАБУ даних досудового розслідування.

Зранку 13 вересня Національне антикорупційне бюро України повідомило Омеляну про підозру в незаконному збагаченні й декларуванні недостовірної інформації.

Міністр заявив про тиск з боку НАБУ, але додав, що йти у відставку не планує.

Дивіться також: Холодницький і Ситник прокоментували конфлікт між САП та НАБУ – відео

14 вересня Солом’янський районний суд Києва віддав Омеляна на поруки міністра молоді і спорту Ігоря Жданова та народного депутата Федора Бендюженка. Спеціалізована антикорупційна прокуратура просила для Омеляна п’ять мільйонів гривень.

Прокуратура вимагає скасувати рішення, яким російську мову визнали регіональною на Донеччині

Прокуратура Донеччини звернулася до суду з вимогою скасувати рішення, яким російську мову визнали регіональною в Донецькій області.

Правоохоронці зазначили, що таке рішення Донецька обласна рада ухвалила 16 серпня 2012 року з метою виконання вимог закону «Про засади державної мовної політики». Водночас 28 лютого 2018 року цей закон був визнаний неконституційним.

«При цьому Донецькою обласною радою не вжито жодних заходів щодо скасування прийнятого нею рішення», –  підкреслили в прокуратурі.

Ухвалений за президентства Віктора Януковича у 2012 році закон «Про засади державної мовної політики» передбачав запровадження офіційної двомовності в регіонах, де чисельність національних меншин перевищує 10 відсотків.

Верховна Рада України проголосувала за скасування «мовного закону» 23 лютого 2014 року, однак президент його не підписував і не ветував.

28 лютого Конституційний суд України визнав закон «про засади державної мовної політики», так званий «закон Колесніченка-Ківалова», неконституційним.

 

 

 

НА ТЕМУ УКРАЇНСЬКОЇ МОВИ:

Не знаєш державної мови – будеш маргіналом без перспектив, без кар’єри, без майбутнього​

Українська красуня біля моря. Одеса стає україномовною

Українське Азовське море: україномовний простір – запорука цілісності держави

75% української мови: в тому числі і для мовлення на ОРДЛО та Крим

В Україні розпочинається десятиліття української мови – указ

Прокуратура вимагає скасувати рішення, яким російську мову визнали регіональною на Донеччині

Прокуратура Донеччини звернулася до суду з вимогою скасувати рішення, яким російську мову визнали регіональною в Донецькій області.

Правоохоронці зазначили, що таке рішення Донецька обласна рада ухвалила 16 серпня 2012 року з метою виконання вимог закону «Про засади державної мовної політики». Водночас 28 лютого 2018 року цей закон був визнаний неконституційним.

«При цьому Донецькою обласною радою не вжито жодних заходів щодо скасування прийнятого нею рішення», –  підкреслили в прокуратурі.

Ухвалений за президентства Віктора Януковича у 2012 році закон «Про засади державної мовної політики» передбачав запровадження офіційної двомовності в регіонах, де чисельність національних меншин перевищує 10 відсотків.

Верховна Рада України проголосувала за скасування «мовного закону» 23 лютого 2014 року, однак президент його не підписував і не ветував.

28 лютого Конституційний суд України визнав закон «про засади державної мовної політики», так званий «закон Колесніченка-Ківалова», неконституційним.

 

 

 

НА ТЕМУ УКРАЇНСЬКОЇ МОВИ:

Не знаєш державної мови – будеш маргіналом без перспектив, без кар’єри, без майбутнього​

Українська красуня біля моря. Одеса стає україномовною

Українське Азовське море: україномовний простір – запорука цілісності держави

75% української мови: в тому числі і для мовлення на ОРДЛО та Крим

В Україні розпочинається десятиліття української мови – указ

Порошенко їде до США 24 вересня – розповість про розірвання договору з Росією

Президент України Петро Порошенко оголосив 21 вересня, що наступного понеділка, 24 вересня, вирушає до США, де візьме участь в роботі сесії Генеральної асамблеї ООН. Про це інформує офіційний сайт глави держави.

Порошенко повідомив про своє доручення, щоб нота України про припинення Договору про дружбу і співробітництво з Російською Федерацією була поширена як офіційний документ Генеральної асамблеї ООН для «того, щоб ні в кого не залишалося сумніву, що Україна остаточно відійшла від Радянської імперії і Російської імперії».

«За моїм дорученням сьогодні Міністерство закордонних справ України офіційно вручило Російській Федерації ноту про непродовження Договору про дружбу і співробітництво з Російською Федерацією. Бо те, що є зараз у нас – дружбою назвати точно язик не повертається… Це є незаконна анексія Криму, це є агресія проти суверенної і незалежної Української держави і українського народу з боку країни-агресора Російської Федерації», – сказав Президент Петро Порошенко під час вручення 10-мільйонного українського біометричного паспорту в центрі надання адміністративних послуг.

Київ надіслав Москві ноту про відмову від пролонгації договору про дружбу. Про це 21 вересня повідомив на брифінгу в Києві міністр закордонних справ України Павло Клімкін.

В Міністерстві закордонних справ Росії небажання України подовжувати договір назвали «антиросійським чадом» і «деструктивними кроками».

Читайте також: «Розірвання договору про дружбу з Росією. Які наслідки для України?​»

Договір про дружбу між Україною і Росією був підписаний 1997 року і нині є чинним. Він, серед іншого, передбачає, що сторони «поважають територіальну цілісність одна одної і підтверджують непорушність існуючих між ними кордонів», а також «будують відносини одна з одною на основі принципів взаємної поваги до суверенної рівності, непорушності кордонів, мирного врегулювання спорів, незастосування сили або загрози силою».

Документ був укладений на термін у десять років; у 2008 році його дію було автоматично продовжено. Щоб припинити дію договору, Україна має офіційно сповістити Росію не пізніше ніж за шість місяців до закінчення чергового десятирічного періоду – тобто до 30 вересня 2018 року.

Росія виступає різко проти нинішньої влади України, яка чинить опір російській гібридній агресії, і, за словами оглядачів і політологів, намагатиметься на майбутніх парламентських і президентських виборах в Україні привести до влади проросійські сили.